Exchange Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. Rose

The sole issue involved in this appeal is whether, under the uncontroverted facts herein below detailed, a claim to a homestead exemption was properly sustained and a levy made thereon discharged.

The facts, as disclosed by the record, were substantially as follows: The defendants in error were husband and wife. The husband acquired title to a five-acre tract of cultivated but unimproved land in 1923, and to an improved noncontiguous tract of 28 acres in 1928 or 1929, and moved his family upon the latter tract in 1930, and upon which they had continuously resided since; that the two tracts…