Legal Opinion

Ambler v. Ambler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*1025Nolan, P. J., Schmidt and TJghetta, JJ., concur; Beldoek, J., concurs in the reversal of the judgment, but dissents from the granting of a new hearing and votes to direct the entry of an interlocutory judgment in favor of appellant, with the following memorandum: I agree with the majority that the evidence, if credited, complied with section 1143 of the Civil Practice Act. The evidence adduced at the hearing before the Official Refere was not contradicted by direct evidence or legitimate inferences; it was not opposed to the probabilities, and there is no reason for denying it eonelusiveness.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Caleca v. CalecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlson v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API