Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 24, 2009No. A08A1604PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Following a bench trial, 16-year-old Andre Lamont Gray was convicted of armed robbery, burglary, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. Gray argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the evidence supporting his conviction was the product of an unlawful search and arrest. For the following reasons, we affirm.

When reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court. Megesi v. State, 277 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Stringer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. State v. COPELAND (Three Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. Silverio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API