Matter of Golding
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has charged that the respondent, Jeffrey A. Golding, violated the Professional Rules of Conduct for Attorneys at Law by neglecting the legal affairs of clients, failing to communicate with clients, failing to return materials to clients following termination of representation, and failing to respond to requests for information from the Disciplinary Commission. The respondent and the Disciplinary Commission have tendered a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in resolution of this matter. Our…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of DarlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of ConwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re FairchildIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re GoldingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011