Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1954No. Crim. 5255PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The appeal in this case presents the question whether a conviction of possession of a narcotic may stand where the accused put the package into his mouth, was choked and wrestled to the ground by the arresting officers until he gave up the package, which was used in evidence to prove the offense. We answer that, in our opinion, such a conviction should not be affirmed.

Rudolph Martinez, the appellant, was charged with a violation of the Health and Safety Code, section 11500 (illegal possession of narcotics), and was convicted, having waived a trial by jury. He appeals from the judgment and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. RochinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. DawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. ParhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API