Legal Opinion

People v. Parham

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1963No. Crim. 7428PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant was convicted on three counts of first degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211a.) He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The appeal from the order denying a new trial is dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1237.)

Defendant contends that he was denied the right to inspect the signed statements of several witnesses and therefore was denied a fair trial, that he was placed in an improperly conducted lineup and therefore his identification by several witnesses was unreliable and prejudicial as a matter of law, that he was arrested without probable cause and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API