Holman v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
The appellant James Holman seeks review by this court of the Pinal County superior court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Although inartfully drafted, the petition filed in the trial court in substance contended that the petitioner’s restraint was illegal in that he was deprived of his constitutional right to appeal. A hearing on the merits was subsequently held and petitioner’s request for habeas corpus relief was denied.
In support of his claim of interference with his right to seek redress in the courts, the appellant sets forth the following facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dowd v. United States Ex Rel. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cochran v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In Re RiddleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. HolmanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donald Emery Major v. Arizona State Prison, John Moran, H. J. Cardwell, Capt. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Bearden v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Cardwell v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Stevenson v. Arizona Board of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Bearden v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.