Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Pierce County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 12, 1980No. 3600-II; 4067-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, A.C.J.

Booth Gardner appeals from a Superior Court judgment affirming the Pierce County Board of Commissioners' approval of a preliminary plat of an area adjacent to his home. The Superior Court determined, among other things, that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the preliminary plat violates a state regulation, WAC 248-96-090. We hold that such a violation was established and the County's negative declaration of environmental significance was consequently clearly erroneous. Hence we reverse.

Wingedfoot Estates, the preliminary plat at issue here, consists of 29.2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zylstra v. PivaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Loveless v. YantisWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Craycroft v. FerrallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Citizens for Clean Air v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ward v. Board of Skagit County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 9 v. Spokane County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API