Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1994No. 1993-0715PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 70 Ohio St.3d 25.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HILL, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Hill,
1994-Ohio-12.] Criminal law—Drug offenses—Forfeiture of property relating to felony drug abuse offense—R.C. 2925.42—Prior to entering order of forfeiture, trial court must make an independent determination whether forfeiture of that property is an "excessive fine" prohibited by the Excessive Fine Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions. Forfeiture of property, pursuant to R.C. 2925.42, is a form of punishment for a specified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Smith, Ct2007-0073 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Watkins, 07 Je 54 (12-12-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Quick, 06-Ca-142 (5-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. FriendOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.