Legal Opinion

SERRA v. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF ESTATE OF BROUGHTON

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 2015No. 112,622,PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATT, J.:

¶ 1 The issue in ■ this case is whether- the plaintiff, Appellant Sandra Vilarrabias' Serra, is covered under the uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) and medical payments (medical pay) coverage of the automobile insurance policy issued to Traci Robertson by the Ap-pellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). In particular, we must decide whether Serra is a “ward” -of Robertson for purposes of coverage under the policy. We hold that she is covered and reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Serra was a foreign exchange student from. Spain who was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. In Re the Estate of BordeauxWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Sperling v. MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Wing v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF STILLWATER, INC. v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSUR. CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. JOHNSON v. BROWNCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024
  4. CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021
  5. CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API