Packer v. Heaton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Sierra. A statement of the facts appears in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This was an action to recover the possession of a mining-claim, and damages for the detention thereof. The defendants had judgment in the Court below, and the plaintiffs appealed.
The main question in this case has relation to what constitutes a forfeiture, or abandonment, of a claim, under the regulations of that particular locality. It appears that in October, 1854, certain rules and regulations were adopted at a meeting of the miners at that point, the fifth of which is as follows:
“ All claimants or companies shall work, or cause to be worked, his or their claims at least two days in every…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Karnes v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Florence-Rae Copper Co. v. KimbelWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Stevens v. North-Western Stage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1875