Legal Opinion

Packer v. Heaton

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Sierra. A statement of the facts appears in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This was an action to recover the possession of a mining-claim, and damages for the detention thereof. The defendants had judgment in the Court below, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The main question in this case has relation to what constitutes a forfeiture, or abandonment, of a claim, under the regulations of that particular locality. It appears that in October, 1854, certain rules and regulations were adopted at a meeting of the miners at that point, the fifth of which is as follows:

“ All claimants or companies shall work, or cause to be worked, his or their claims at least two days in every…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karnes v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Florence-Rae Copper Co. v. KimbelWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stevens v. North-Western Stage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API