Legal Opinion

Maier v. Holzer

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1963No. 8033PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damages growing out of an automobile accident. The plaintiffs allege that their damages resulted from the negligence and carelessness of the defendant, Anton Holzer, in operating an automobile. The defendant answers by way of general denial and further alleges contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff Herman J. Maier, who at the time of the accident was driving an automobile in which the other plaintiffs were riding.

The answer alleges that the injuries to the plaintiffs were directly and proximately caused by the negligence and unlawful…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Haser v. PapeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Schnell v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Miller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cook v. StenslieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Brauer v. James J. Igoe & Sons Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rau v. KirschenmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Zimmer v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API