Legal Opinion

Noah v. L. Daitch & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

Defendants move under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency.

Plaintiffs, owners of a retail dairy and grocery store, selling Daitch dairy products with the right to use and display the Daitch trade-mark as a “ Daitch Dairy ’ ’ agency store, bring this action for a permanent injunction restraining defendant L, Daitch & Co. Inc. (herein “Daitch”) from terminating its agreement with plaintiffs and defendant Daitch-Shopwell Central Westchester, Inc. (herein “Shopwell”) from interfering with the continuance of plaintiffs’ business as an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Buckley v. 112 Central Park South, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Coleman & Morris v. PisciottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Shaw v. BurchfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rampy v. ICI Acrylics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Martin Ice Cream Co. v. Chipwich, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Robbins v. Ogden Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API