Legal Opinion

State v. Zottnick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2011No. 20100310PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Ryan Zottnick appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of violating an order prohibiting contact with Katie Abt. Zottnick argues the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on excuse and there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged Zottnick with violating an order prohibiting contact under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-31.2-02, alleging he had direct contact with Abt from November 1 through 3, 2009, in violation of an October 19, 2009 order prohibiting that contact. The October 19,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KleppeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MartinezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. KalmioNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. PavlicekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API