Legal Opinion

Golden v. Bank of Tallassee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1994No. 1930229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Justice.

The Bank of Tallassee (“the Bank”) sued to collect on a promissory note originally executed by Ronnie D. Golden. Golden counterclaimed, alleging fraud. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the Bank on both its claim and on Golden’s counterclaim. Golden appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether the trial court correctly held that Golden was responsible for the promissory note debt.

A motion for a summary judgment may be granted only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Southern Guar. Ins. Co. v. First Ala. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cook's Pest Control, Inc. v. RebarSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Stinson v. America's Home Place, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Graybar Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. GRUPO HGM Tecnologias Submarina, S.A. v. Energy Subsea, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Graybar Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API