Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Stack

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1908No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Delta; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Augustus W. Wolfe against John K. Stack, surviving partner of himself and John Corcoran, deceased, copartners as Stack & Corcoran, and the Escanaba Lumber Company, for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Suit was brought by the plaintiff, for himself and as assignee of the firms named in the title of the cause, against John K. Stack, as surviving partner of himself and John Corcoran, deceased, copartners, doing business under the firm name of “ Stack & Corcoran.” The declaration is on the common counts in assumpsit and alleges further that they were partners under the firm name of the “Escanaba Lumber Company.” The suit was brought, as stated in the bill of particulars, to recover for goods sold and delivered to the Escanaba Lumber Company: It was stipulated that plaintiff’s claim, as set out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conely v. DudleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Johnson v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Chapelle v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Reed's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gold v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Canerdy v. Port Huron, St. Clair & Marine City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Sandstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Marx v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API