Legal Opinion

Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. Mather

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by tbe Michigan Mutual Life Insurance Company against Horatio N. Mather upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant to recover the amount due upon a promissory note. The defense interposed was that in December, 1890, the plaintiff issued to the defendant a policy of insurance upon which the premium for the ensuing year was $452.25; that the company accepted for said premium $113.05; and that a policy issued under such circumstances was void under the provisions of Act No. 171, Pub. Acts 1889; and that the note sued upon was given to renew a void policy, and was, therefore, without consideration. . After the testimony was all in, defendant asked the court to direct a verdict in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson Bridge & Iron Co. v. Lancashire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Wolfe v. StackMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API