Legal Opinion
Jones v. City University of New York
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 21, 1983No. Claim No. 64373PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
The principal issue raised on this motion to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act is whether the delay was excusable.
This is the second time this matter is before this court. On July 21, 1980, we held that the claim was timely filed for the reason that a claim against the City University of New York (CUNY) does not accrue until 30 days have elapsed from the presentation to it of a demand in accordance with the requirements of subdivision 2 of section 6224 of the Education Law (Jones v City Univ. of N.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Santana v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Brinkley v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Jones v. City Univ. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rios v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ferster v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985