Jones v. City Univ. of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case returned to the Court of Claims for consideration of respondent’s motion for permission to file a late claim.
It was error on the part of the courts below to have concluded that subdivision 2 of section 6224 of the Education Law (as it existed prior to the 1982 amendment, see below) operated to extend the 90-day period of limitation for filing claims (or notices of intention to file claims) prescribed in subdivision 3 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act. The latter subdivision…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Brinkley v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bicjan v. Hunter College of the City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1982
- Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Johnson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.