Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Challiss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Atchison District Court. Ejectment. The opinion states the material facts. Judgment for the plaintiff Challiss, at the February term, 1885. The defendants, Jackson and another, bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This action was instituted by Luther C. Challiss in the district court of Atchison county, on the 3d day of September, 1883, to recover possession of lot number one, block number thirty-five, and lot number one, block thirty-six, both in L. C. Challiss’s addition to the city of Atchison. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and conclusions of fact and of law found, and stated by the court as follows:

“1. On March 15, 1858, the plaintiff, Luther C. Challiss, caused to be filed in the office of the recorder or register of deeds of Atchison county, Kansas…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Hollenback v. EssSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Fox v. CrossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Blackistone v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Gray v. CoanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pearcy v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Barker v. TraberCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
  3. Booge v. RitchieCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API