Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Pullman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2001No. 00-709PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Eugene F. Hughes, Jr., brought this action against defendants for false imprisonment, civil conspiracy, breach of contract and civil rights violations. The United States District Court granted defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to the civil rights claims and remanded the remaining state law claims to the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County. That court granted defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the remaining issues. Hughes appeals. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court improperly dismissed Hughes’s false imprisonment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Lindey's Inc. v. Professional Consultants, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Klock v. Town of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lawler v. Eugene Wuesthoff Memorial Hosp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hughes v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rosenthal v. County of MadisonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Flathead Citizens for Quality Growth, Inc. v. Flathead County Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Blixseth v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
  5. Kichnet v. Butte-Silver Bow CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API