Cecil Jones v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
The Supreme Court held 1 that this appellant had “standing” to challenge the sufficiency of a search warrant, but re*382manded the case to the District Court to consider the contention, not previously there raised, that the search warrant had not been executed in conformity with the statute.2 The District Judge before whom the case had been tried conducted a hearing. He found as a fact and concluded as a matter of law that the warrant had been properly executed. The background for this appeal follows.
On August 21, 1957, Detective Di-done of the Narcotics Squad, Metropolitan…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. MarianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Koptyra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Fred Sykes v. United States of America, Thomas Ruffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Commonwealth v. DuncanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.