Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1976No. 8284PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge.

This appeal involves a warrantless forced entry into appellant’s apartment which resulted in his arrest and the seizure of certain physical evidence. Appellant was charged with single counts of rape, sodomy, simple assault, and threats to do bodily harm. D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-2801, -3502, -504, and -507. In a jury trial he was acquitted of the rape and sodomy charges and found guilty on the assault and threats counts. He appeals the convictions on the ground that they rest upon evidence seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, and contends the trial court…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Peay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API