Legal Opinion

United States v. DeCologero

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 12, 2004No. 03-1443, 03-1442PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Chief Judge.

Before us are a pair of interlocutory appeals in a criminal case. Both grow out of a 23-count federal indictment filed on October 17, 2001, charging Paul A. DeCo-logero and six associates with criminal racketeering in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (2000), 1 conspiracy to violate RICO, id. § 1962(d) and an array of related crimes. We refer to Paul A. DeCologero as “DeCologero” even though several co-defendants have the same last name.

The government alleged that DeCologe-ro headed a criminal enterprise (“the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., Frank E. Corrente, and Richard E. AutielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. BascianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. SchiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Philip E. Watson and Shane E. O'HearnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Cacho BonillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API