Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip E. Watson and Shane E. O'Hearn

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 12, 2004No. 04-1913PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This interlocutory appeal arrives on our doorstep following the district court’s denial of a brink-of-trial continuance which, according to the prosecution, was necessitated by an Executive Branch faux pas de deux. The threshold question is one of first impression: Does the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3731, afford jurisdiction to review the specific orders issued by the district court? Concluding that the orders appealed from are not within the purview of that statute, we answer this question in the negative and dismiss the government’s appeal.

In order to place the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. WuterichCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. VargasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  5. United States v. Rivera-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API