Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott Andrew Shovea, Gebbie Hugh Robba, Stephen Howard Gaias, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1978No. 77-1078, 77-1079 and 77-1184PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Scott Shovea (Shovea), Gebbie Robba (Robba) and Stephen Gaias (Gaias) appeal their jury convictions of conspiracy to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2 and 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1).
Appellants were originally indicted with Geoffrey Hungerford (Hungerford). At the commencement of the trial, the Government dismissed its charges against Hunger-ford. Thereafter, a mistrial was declared as to Gaias. The trial proceeded as to Shovea and Robba. They were convicted. Subsequent…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Bernardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Clark Bailey and Carolyn GomezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Dale David Bruneau, United States of America v. Jeffrey Charles KohnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Monty Edward Clayborne, Jr. And George IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.