United States v. Clark Bailey and Carolyn Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This case of first impression for our Circuit requires us to review a district court’s order suppressing evidence in a drug prosecution where the Government used a “beep*939er” 1 to monitor the location of a drum of chemicals. Although the beeper does nothing more than reveal its own location, we conclude that its use, on the facts of this case, violated the fourth amendment.
I
On April 25, 1978, in Hartford, Connecticut, an informer advised a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent that Carolyn Ann Gomez was attempting to purchase chemicals in order to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Ohio Civil Service Employees Association v. Richard P. SeiterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Kenneth KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Delphine O. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Bernardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.