Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark Bailey and Carolyn Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1980No. 79-5092PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case of first impression for our Circuit requires us to review a district court’s order suppressing evidence in a drug prosecution where the Government used a “beep*939er” 1 to monitor the location of a drum of chemicals. Although the beeper does nothing more than reveal its own location, we conclude that its use, on the facts of this case, violated the fourth amendment.

I

On April 25, 1978, in Hartford, Connecticut, an informer advised a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent that Carolyn Ann Gomez was attempting to purchase chemicals in order to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association v. Richard P. SeiterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Kenneth KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Delphine O. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Bernardo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Fernando Francis, United States of America v. Clara Francis, and Fernando FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API