Goldberg v. Travelers Fire Ins.
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGPIT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has moved to take the deposition of a witness who is one of the attorneys for the defendant. The subpoena duces tecum would require the witness to produce “all books, papers, records, reports, data and investigations by the defendant and the witness. The witness, for his firm of attorneys, has filed a counter motion to vacate and set aside the notice of taking the deposition and to quash the subpoena duces tecum on the ground that the testimony of the witness would be privileged; that he has no personal knowledge of any facts relevant to the case but his entire…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jenkins v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949
- Sunday v. Gas Service Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- In re Penn Central Commercial Paper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973