Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Cam Development Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1989No. 77835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff filed a petition in the probate court to remove an ob- .. struction from a private way. See OCGA § 44-9-59. It was alleged that plaintiff’s property is served by a private way which lies in part upon' land owned by defendant; and that defendant obstructed the private way by placing a fence across it. Defendant answered the petition, denying that plaintiff was entitled to a right of private way upon de-. fendant’s land.

The case was tried by the probate court sitting without a jury. Upon the conclusion of the case, the probate court denied plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Watkins v. Country ClubSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Hopkins v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Smith v. E. B. Burney Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James Szalay v. Anne AlbenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Henderson v. Cam Development Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Marshall Floyd, Jr. v. James T. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API