Legal Opinion

James Szalay v. Anne Albenberg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 2015No. A15A0175, A15A0176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFadden, Judge.

Anne Albenberg, whose property is landlocked, filed this action against adjoining landowners James and Karin Szalay, seeking, among other things, an ingress-egress easement across the Szalays’ property. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted both motions in part and denied both motions in part, and these appeals followed.

We find that the trial court correctly determined that Albenberg has an express easement across the Szalays’ property, a finding with which the Szalays now agree. But we reject Albenberg’s contention that that express easement can be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Herren v. PettengillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Gaines v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Miller v. SlaterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Hasty v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Lanier v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. FOX v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Emson Investment Properties, LLC v. Jhj Jodeco 65, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Pass v. Forestar Ga Real Estate Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Matthews, M. v. Teslovich, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Matthews, M. v. Teslovich, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API