Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
930 A.2d 599 (2007)
Curtis BOWMAN, Petitioner
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted May 25, 2007.
Decided July 17, 2007.
David Crowley, Bellefonte, for petitioner.
Arthur R. Thomas, Asst. Counsel and Victoria S. Madden, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.
BEFORE: LEADBETTER, President Judge, FRIEDMAN, Judge, and McCLOSKEY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY SENIOR Judge McCLOSKEY.
Curtis Bowman (Petitioner) petitions for review from a determination of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) recalculating Petitioner's parole…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kevin L. Barden v. Patrick Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.