Legal Opinion

Follender v. Scheidegg

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 18, 1997No. 95-788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum opinion

BROCK, C.J.

The plaintiff, Richard C. Follender, sued the defendant, Carl R Scheidegg, for unpaid legal fees. The defendant responded with a counterclaim for legal malpractice. Following a pretrial hearing on pending motions, the Superior Court (Hampsey, J.) dismissed the counterclaim for failing to provide expert evidence of causation. We affirm.

Although we have not previously addressed the issue, we assume without deciding that, at least for the purposes of this case, expert testimony is required to prove proximate cause in a legal malpractice action. See Harris v. Magri,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. ERG, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. Dube v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Harris v. MagriMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Arsenault v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carbone v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. In Re R & R Associates of Hampton, Debtor. Dennis Bezanson, Trustee of the Estate of R & R Associates of Hampton v. Thomas J. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Bel Air Associates v. New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API