Arsenault v. Scanlon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiffs appeal the order of the Superior Court (Goode, J.) denying their motion to amend their writ. We affirm.
This case commenced when the plaintiffs filed a writ of summons on March 21, 1991. In response to the plaintiffs’writ, the defendants filed numerous motions to dismiss. The superior court denied these motions but twice ordered the plaintiffs to file factual supplements to their original writ. Eventually, on July 20, 1992, the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) ruled that the plaintiffs had failed to comply with the prior orders directing them to particularize the specific claims…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- ERG, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Belcher v. PaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Hodgdon v. Beatrice D. Weeks Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Hodgdon v. Beatrice D. Weeks Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- McDermott v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. CreteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Galibois v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Desaulnier v. Manchester School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Kalil v. Town of Dummer Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Follender v. ScheideggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.