Hamburg v. Doak
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The parties will be designated hereinafter as they appeared in the trial court, that is, plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs and the defendants in error as defendants, or as Mary Kate Doak.
Plaintiffs instituted this action in the district court of Murray county on the 5th day of April, 1949, and subsequently filed their last amended petition on the 1st day of October, 1949. Defendants answered and filed a cross-petition on the 3rd day of November, 1949. The issues were finally joined between the parties by the plaintiffs filing their answer to the defendants’ cross-petition.
The record discloses…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Derdyn v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Yarbrough v. BellamySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Mahan v. DunklemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Montgomery v. WillbanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Blanchard v. GordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Treece v. TreeceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Starnes v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.