Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1979No. 2202 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through its Department of Mines and Minerals, now the Department of Environmental Resources, (Commonwealth) instituted this action against The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) which is the surety on a performance bond for the construction of a water demineralization plant by the Pitt Construction Company (Pitt). Hartford has filed preliminary objections to the Commonwealth’s complaint in the *135nature of a motion to strike, a motion for a more specific pleading and a demurrer. Hartford has also filed complaints to join as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. In the Matter of the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, the Plywood Company of Pennsylvania, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Wells v. Pittsburgh Board of Public EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Breslin, R. v. Mountain View Nursing Home, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Telstar Corp. v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. O'Donnell v. CaseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Boettger v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API