Legal Opinion

De Armond v. Glasscock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

The appellees, who are husband and wife, sued the appellant. The first four of the paragraphs of the complaint are based on the following contract:

“Received of Sarah Glasscock one hundred and thirty dollars, being payment for a house and lot, now lived in by said Sarah, in the town of Westport, which I agree to make a quitclaim deed to said property in six months from this date; this April 28 th, 1860. Thomas De Armond.”

The paragraphs need not be separately noticed. They allege that De Armond failed to execute the deed within the time stipulated in the said contract. It is also alleged that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. SpaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Gaar v. LockridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Kantrowitz v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Simpson v. NilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Crickmore v. BreckenridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Shive v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API