Legal Opinion

Gaar v. Lockridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1857PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Hendricks Court of - Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

Garr, the appellant, brought this action against Lockridge, the appellee, upon a promissory note for 190 dollars, dated March 8, 1852, due April 1, 1853, payable to one Kennedy, and by him indorsed to the plaintiff.

The note stated that it was given for the balance of the purchase-money of lot No. 7, in block No. 27, in the town of Danville.

The defendant answered in two paragraphs. The first alleges that at the time of executing the note, Kennedy *94made to the defendant a title-bond, -with condition that, on payment of said note, he would convey said lot to the defendant by deed in fee, clear of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barickman v. KuykendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Brumfield v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Cain v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Patten v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Day v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Gottschalk v. MeisenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hazleton v. Le DucCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
  5. Cressey v. WebbIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API