Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Breidigan v. Indust. Comm.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1942No. 3399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above-entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of relator’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio.

The original action was one in mandamus, wherein relator sought a mandatory order against the respondent requiring it to enter a final order in the proceedings before the Industrial Commission, denying relator’s application upon the ground that the condition of permanent and total disability is not the result of said injury.

Issues were joined; evidence presented, briefs filed and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Myers v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. State ex rel. Stelzer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State Ex Rel. Nemeth v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. State ex rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. State ex rel. McDonald v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API