Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nemeth v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1953No. 4879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

This is an action in mandamus, seeking aji order requiring the respondent commission to make an award to relator under Section 1465-80, General Code, because he is afflicted with silicosis contracted in his employment and a change of occupation is medically advisable.

The factual background, upon which relator’s cause of action is predicated, is that on and prior to July 25, 1950, he was employed as a molder with the John Harsch Bronze & Foundry Company, an employer amenable to the Workmen’s Compensation Act and paying premiums according to law into the State Insurance Fund; that on July…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Breidigan v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Myers v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Chrysler v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API