State Ex Rel. Nemeth v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.
This is an action in mandamus, seeking aji order requiring the respondent commission to make an award to relator under Section 1465-80, General Code, because he is afflicted with silicosis contracted in his employment and a change of occupation is medically advisable.
The factual background, upon which relator’s cause of action is predicated, is that on and prior to July 25, 1950, he was employed as a molder with the John Harsch Bronze & Foundry Company, an employer amenable to the Workmen’s Compensation Act and paying premiums according to law into the State Insurance Fund; that on July…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Breidigan v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
- State ex rel. Myers v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Chrysler v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1984