Legal Opinion
Racing Strollers, Inc. v. Tri Industries, Inc., Jay Paulson, Paulson Marketing and Tim Galligan
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 1989No. 89-1241PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal comes to us under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the District Court for the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, Rosenbaum, J., having certified to this court a potentially controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, the answer to which may advance the ultimate determination of this ongoing litigation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1292(c), 1338(a), and 1295(a).
Appellant, Racing Strollers, Inc., filed its Petition for Leave to Appeal under § 1292(b) which we granted by order dated January 6,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc. v. Caldor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of CampbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In Re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Harter v. GAF Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- In Re Scott J. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Inre: Timothy OwensCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.