Legal Opinion
Stottlemire v. Cawood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 1963No. Civ. A. 1356-58PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
The trial of this case having terminated in a directed verdict in favor of each defendant, the plaintiff moves for a new trial. A number of grounds are advanced in support of the motion. Most of them have already been discussed in full, either during the trial or in connection with the direction of the verdict, 213 F.Supp. 897. One point relating to the admissibility of evidence seems to merit comment at this juncture.
This action was brought against a physician and a manufacturer and distributor of drugs, to recover damages for negligence claimed to have resulted in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Stottlemire v. CawoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
- Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Dolcin Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Bowers v. GarfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974