Legal Opinion
Nicholson v. Mabus
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s [6] Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings claims against Defendant Mabus in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy for gender and age discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. Plaintiffs action is predicated on him allegedly being denied, because of his gender and age, an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicholson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Moore v. DeJoyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Pennington v. Tetra Tech, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- United States of America v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Williams v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.