Ladeau v. Department of Employment Security
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentSmith, J.
(Dissenting) There can be no doubt that the instant case is of minor consequence, except to the appellant, nor that the opinion of the majority sets forth any new or startling conclusions of law. As the majority points out, the *390question presented is more nearly a factual question, rather than one of law, with the only matter for decision being whether the appellant quit his job or was fired.
The answer arrived at by the majority centers about the meaning to be attributed to the employer’s use of the words, “Okay, you can pick up your two weeks’ severance pay.” The majority determined that this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clarke v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Davidson v. Life Savers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1973