Legal Opinion

Clarke v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1973No. Docket 11905PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

Plaintiffs were all salaried employees of the defendant. For several years they had been employed by the defendant at its Kalamazoo division. This division was sold by the defendant to Tartan Industries. The sales agreement *669prohibited the defendant from employing any of the plaintiffs for one year. Tartan Industries offered all of the plaintiffs employment, but the plaintiffs chose not to become employees of Tartan. Plaintiffs seek severance pay from the defendant.

For several years the defendant had a severance pay policy with a stated purpose:

"The purpose of this procedure is to outline the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cain v. Allen Electric & Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Barke v. Grand Mobile Homes Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Kahoun v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Bankey v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API