Legal Opinion
Swensen v. Lofton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 6, 1984No. 83-2517PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
The opinion of the Court dated May 25, 1984, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a' temporary injunction brought pursuant to Rule of Appellate Pro*1070cedure 9.130(a)(3)(B). We agree with appellants’ contention that appellees’ application for temporary injunction is insufficient because it fails to set forth clearly, definitely and unequivocally sufficient factual allegations to support appellees’ conclusion of “irreparable damage” necessary to warrant intervention of a court…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- First National Bank in St. Petersburg v. FerrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Quadomain Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. PomerantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Seashore Club of Atlantic City, Inc. v. TesslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
4Cited by4 opinions
- Jacksonville v. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADV.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Bentley v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- GEORGE LEPOSKY v. GLORIA EGODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Tribune Co. v. DanielsCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1986