Legal Opinion

F. V. Investments, N. V. v. Sicma Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 1982No. 81-2421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The preliminary injunction issued pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a) is reversed on two grounds. First, the acts enjoined by the injunction are not specified with such reasonable definiteness and certainty that the defendants bound by the decree would know what they must refrain from doing without the matter being left to speculation and conjecture. See Moore v. City Dry Cleaners & Laundry, Inc., 41 So.2d 865, 871 (Fla.1949). Secondly, the complaint for injunctive relief fails to set forth clearly, definitely, and unequivo*756cally sufficient allegations to warrant the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. City Dry Cleaners LaundrySupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  2. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Stanton v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E-Racer Tech, LLC v. Office of the Attorney General Department of Legal AffairsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Swensen v. LoftonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Florida Crime Prevention Commission v. CafieroCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API