Henning v. Western Union Tel. Co.

This case was originally brought in the state court. It was removed into this court, plaintiff being a resident of the state of South Carolina, and the defendant being a foreign corporation. After its removal the plaintiff obtained leave to amend his complaint by inserting the appointment and the name of his guardian ad litem, and defendant had leave to answer the complaint when so amended. Thereupon defendant, under our seventy-fifth rule, served notice for security for costs. The plaintiff resists this motion, because he is a resident of the state of South Carolina, and as such not liable…