Bourget v. Donaldson
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Defendant ■ Reid appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Complainant, as subcontractor, and as assignee of one Vanderworp, another subcontractor, under defendant Dean, filed his bill of complaint, under the mechanics'’ lien law, to enforce a claim of lien on real estate owned by defendant Donaldson, making one Eeid a party because he claimed the money due from Donaldson, under an ‘assignment thereof from Dean, made prior to the filing of the claim of lien. The bill Ayas taken as confessed by defendant Dean. Defendants Donaldson and Eeid filed separate answers, to which complainant filed general replications. The decree is in favor of complainant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John Spry Lumber Co. v. Sault Savings Bank Loan & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Kane v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Roberts v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spengler v. Stiles-Tull Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1909
- Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. MosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. AirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Carter v. BradySupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- McNeal v. GossardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.