Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Voss

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1906No. 14,551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; THOMAS C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

Plaintiff in error brought this suit to enjoin an execution issued upon a judgment recovered in the city court of Wichita. From a judgment of the *419district court dissolving the temporary injunction he brings the case here for review.

The execution sought to be enjoined was issued upon a judgment against Briggs in an action of forcible entry and detainer, rendered by James A. Conly as judge pro tem. of the city court of Wichita, and it is claimed that he was neither a judge de jure nor de facto, and that the judgment for that reason was void.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Ritchie v. MulvaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olathe Hospital Foundation, Inc. v. Extendicare, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Humphrey v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. Clark v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Satterthwaite v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API