Legal Opinion
Meadow Brook National Bank v. Rogers
Nassau County District Court
Decided October 30, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.
The plaintiff, a holder in due course of the check sued on, moves for summary judgment.
The defendant is the maker of the check which was •’made payable to the order of one James Thomas, who cashed it at one of the plaintiff’s branches. The defendant urges that although the check was knowingly made payable to James Thomas, she was induced to do so by his false statement that he was not the “ person who painted Mrs. Franklin’s house.”
The New York Uniform Commercial Code, effective September 27, 1964, section 3-305, reads:
“ Section 3-305. Eights of a Holder in Due Course. To the extent that a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Bank of BlasdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- First National Bank v. MarguliesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
- Scherr v. Taylor International Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Cooper v. Broadcasting Co. of Carolinas, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens National Bank of Englewood v. Fort Lee Savings & Loan AssociationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Woodhouse, Drake & Carey, Ltd. v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Marine Midland Trust Co. of Rochester v. BlackburnNew York Supreme Court · 1966